Cybersecurity Company System
Security testing, awareness, and cyber incident-response companies.
The testing engagement from assessment to vulnerability documentation, reporting, remediation, and retesting through to certification.
No credit card required — your project is set up with the full system in under a minute
This is the system board as you'll receive it: workflow columns and starter cards showing the first steps
How does work flow in this system?
Every security engagement starts as a card in “Assessment”, where the testers run the technical testing of the target systems within the agreed scope. Each discovered vulnerability moves as a card to “Vulnerability Documentation” with its description, severity, exploitation method, and evidence; they are then compiled in “Report”, written in language the client's management understands, not only technicians. After delivery, the cards move to “Remediation”, where the client's team fixes the vulnerabilities, then “Verification” with retesting to confirm actual closure, and finally “Certification” with issuance of the engagement-completion certificate.
The Forum is the team's knowledge base: unusual cases, new exploitation techniques, and the lessons of every engagement — knowledge that compounds instead of staying locked in whoever ran the test. Dues manages periodic testing contracts: a quarterly or semi-annual assessment for each client with its value and due date. Chat is for coordination during sensitive engagements — with strict discipline: no sensitive vulnerability details in Chat, only on the cards with their permissions. Announcements is for urgent security alerts affecting all clients, such as a newly circulating vulnerability.
The team lead assigns engagements, approves reports before delivery, and owns the severity-rating call when opinions differ; testers run the assessment and document vulnerabilities with evidence; and auditors review the “Report” and retest in “Verification”. Sensitive information flows with discipline: from the tester to the card to the report to the client — no screenshots in Chat and no vulnerabilities in personal files.
Who does what?
The operational roles in this system and each role's responsibility in daily work — assign them to your team as-is or adapt them to your reality.
Team Lead
Assigns engagements and defines scopes with clients, approves reports in “Report” before delivery, and settles severity ratings when opinions differ.
Security Testers
Execute the assessment in “Assessment” and document every vulnerability as a card in “Vulnerability Documentation” with description, evidence, exploitation method, and severity.
Auditors
Review reports before delivery to the client, and retest in “Verification” to confirm vulnerabilities are actually closed, not cosmetically.
Contracts Coordinator
Manages periodic testing contracts in Dues — due dates and renewals — and prepares completion certificates after each engagement closes.
What's prepared for you from day one?
System units
- Tasks — A kanban board with workflow columns and execution cards
- Chat — The team's fast daily coordination channel
- Forum — Documented discussions in organized sections — decisions and knowledge that never get lost
- Announcements — The official voice of management — circulars and alerts that reach everyone
- Dues — Internal money with strict privacy — dues, advances, and expenses
Forum sections (4)
- Cases & LearningsDocumenting unusual security cases and how they were handled — the team's knowledge base that compounds from engagement to engagement.
- New Vulnerabilities & TechniquesTracking circulating vulnerabilities, modern exploitation tools, and emerging testing techniques, and evaluating work tools.
- Testing MethodologiesThe approved methodologies for each engagement type — web applications, networks, social engineering — and their updates.
- Report TemplatesThe approved technical and executive report templates and improvement notes based on how clients respond to them.
«Working Rules for This System» — Pinned in the forum
1) No testing outside the scope written on the engagement card — exceeding the scope is a professional and legal offense. 2) Vulnerability details and evidence live on the cards only — circulating them in Chat or personal channels is forbidden. 3) Every vulnerability is an independent card with a severity rating settled by the team lead when opinions differ. 4) No report is delivered without an auditor's review and the team lead's approval. 5) “Certification” is not issued before retesting in “Verification” and proving the critical vulnerabilities are closed. 6) Every engagement closes with a documented lesson in the “Cases & Learnings” section, however routine it was.
Welcome announcement: «Welcome to the Security System»
From today, every testing engagement passes as a card from “Assessment” to “Certification”, and every vulnerability is documented with its evidence on its card — no sensitive details in Chat, ever. Cases we learn from are recorded in the “Cases & Learnings” section before the engagement closes. First step: register ongoing engagements and periodic testing contracts. The working rules are pinned in the Forum.
Systems similar to this one
Ready? Your first project is two minutes away
Create your free workspace now, and invite your team before the day is over.